Comments on: Addicting Info’s nonsensical “analysis” of an active shooter simulation

By: Josh C

Josh C — Wed, 03 Jun 2015 14:30:51 +0000

Late tangent on foggy masks: you can mostly fix that by putting a thin film of shampoo on the inside. Baby shampoo works great.

By: Kirk Parker

Kirk Parker — Fri, 06 Feb 2015 08:32:35 +0000

Isn’t there a little too much emphasis here on the hopelessness of pistol vs rifle? This was indoors, in a modest-sized building! Plenty close enough for pistol rounds (and pistol accuracy) to have made a difference (and in at least once in the simulation, it did!)

By: LCB

LCB — Wed, 04 Feb 2015 17:46:14 +0000

In reply to Goober.

There was a time where I thought, “If I’m alone, I won’t take another life to protect myself.” But then I realized, if I had even a chance to stop somebody, and I don’t try, then whatever they do next is partially on me. So now I run my mind through the scenarios. I won’t like it if it ever happens. It’ll probably mess me up for life. But I’ll stand before my God knowing I did the right thing if that time comes.

By: “Your Brain on Guns” | Shall Not Be Questioned

“Your Brain on Guns” | Shall Not Be Questioned — Wed, 04 Feb 2015 17:04:46 +0000

[…] I’ve seen in a while on the topic of guns. The media’s narrative on that simulation has already been dismantled by people far more expert than I. But this article promotes the idea that the mere presence of […]

By: Bob

Bob — Mon, 02 Feb 2015 03:44:38 +0000

Why doesn’t anyone consider the possibility of more than one citizens carrying a weapon? I would have been interested to see the results of simulations with two or even three armed citizens.